Talk:Laudetur Jesus Christus

Catholicism Low‑importance

Laudetur Jesus Christus is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

[Untitled][edit]

This is a standard phrase, which is used for centuries by members of catholic communes of different countries. It absolutely can be considered not as sequence of separate words, but as a whole well known expression. Ans-mo 09:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Polish tradition, the answer to the greeting was "In secula seculorum," meaning "Forever and ever." 74.121.208.109 02:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, is not spelled that way in Latin. It is spelled Iesus. So this page should be moved to Laudetur Iesus Christus

[[User:|none]] 13:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.212.60.116 (talk)

This question needs further studying and expertise of specialist in the related field. Reliable source (Vatican radio) says "Laudetur Jesus Christus" (http://www.vatican.va/news_services/radio/index.htm). Anyway I have made a redirect of Laudetur Iesus Christus to Laudetur Jesus Christus.Ans-mo (talk) 07:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First link in references leads to not found (404 page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1A68:4:42:E996:D3D1:5238:99A7 (talk) 10:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laudetur Jesus Christus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215074119/http://www.parafiajozefow.pl/content/view/49/91/ to http://www.parafiajozefow.pl/content/view/49/91/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]