Talk:Laurence Ginnell

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Date of birth[edit]

Can someone please provide date of birth with ref. Thanks. RashersTierney (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ginnell 1917-18[edit]

Ginnell did not resign from the Commons on joining Sinn Fein in 1917. His last speech in the Commons was in June 1917 and after he must have become an abstentionist, but in March 1918 the Dublin Police wrote to the Speaker to inform him they had arrested an MP.

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1918/apr/09/mr-ginnell-conviction

91.213.110.4 (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Laurence Ginnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bias re: Ranch War[edit]

"In reality, the Ranch War involved an implosion within sectors of the Irish Party, as its leadership had not facilitated the working of the Wyndham Land Purchase Act in the first place because John Dillon and his like wanted conflict above victory." This seems like a very biased statement to include as an objectively stated fact, with only one source. I find it hard to think any politician or party can be neutrally, objectively declared to "want conflict above victory", so this is a very disputable statement to me, about this or any case. This should be proven with more sources, or else be rewritten to either include other perspectives, or to state this is only one opinion by certain people. VolatileChemical (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]