Talk:Laurent Eketebi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Punctuation needs work - lots of missing commas, but this is not part of the criteria

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Well references with several books and other sources. Copyvio detector showed up nothing

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Whilst the article doesn’t cover everything in detail, it covers the main aspects and is continually focused on the subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Lacking important images but not a reason to fail

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Needs a little bit of work with punctuation, but good in quality and well referenced. Well done