Jump to content

Talk:Lava Canyon Falls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revision

[edit]

This page needs some major revision. Lava Canyon was first and foremost not formed by the 1980 eruption and all of the waterfalls within it did exist prior to the eruption. The bedrock formations were not as exposed and the falls weren't accessible prior to the construction of the trail system post-eruption.
Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think by reading the info present in the article, the author(s) (including me) have probably tried to present the fact that the falls were re-formed recently, but just didn't mention that the falls existed in the past before the mudflows, lahars, etc. buried the canyon. In the entry on Waterfalls Northwest, you wrote this: "canyon that lay covered by dirt, rock and forest for 1800 years". So I probably interpreted that to be that the falls themselves did not exist, but the rock formations did.
Also, you mentioned that "the Muddy River re-occupied the canyon" so that was what made me think that there was no water feeding the falls prior to the eruption, and so therefore they did not exist. Sorry, though, if the misinterpreted info has been lying around for some time... themaeetalk 00:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lava Canyon Falls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]