Talk:Layla El

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLayla El has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Kharma[edit]

The Kharma links redirects to karma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.3.18.100 (talk) 07:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship[edit]

Layla El Has Been Dating Cody Runnels — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.155.109.154 (talk) 15:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Teamlaycool, 9 August 2011[edit]

plss let me edit layla El wiki because you dont have a nasty kick as a signature its a spinning heel kick to the face


Teamlaycool (talk) 07:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be able to edit this page you can attempt to request for it to be unprotected here, or become Autoconfirmed. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 07:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finisher[edit]

"Neckbreaker" is a very broad term. I'm not exactly sure what her version of it is though. Looks a bit like a Hangman's Neckbreaker in a sit-out position instead of lying down. 202.156.11.12 (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Birth Year[edit]

On her offical twitter account, she states that she was turning 35 on her birthday this year, which would make her birth year 1977, not 1978. link to statementWikiuser20102011 (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 1 August 2012[edit]

Layla El's Wikipedia page was edited and her name was changed to Layla No Reaction El. I would like the "No Reaction" part removed as it was edited by an idiot. Layla's middle name is not No Reaction. So, thank you. Laylaelorg (talk) 04:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's been fixed. RudolfRed (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Face Lift should be retired[edit]

I haven't seen Layla use the Face Lift recently. I think she's retired this move. Please fix this or tell me the last time she has used it. Thanks. 209.213.145.236 (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

It only makes sense to have the most recent things like her 2013 heel turn having its own section. She should at least have her themes listed like everyone else. --Evil Yugi (talk) 01:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The new section would be 2 sentences long. It's unnecessary clutter. As for her themes, if you can provide reliable sources (Wikipedia and YouTube are not RS) for them, feel free to add them. Otherwise, they stay out. NiciVampireHeart 10:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Everyone else has their themes. Why not her? --Evil Yugi (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are over 4 million articles on Wikipedia. Of those articles over 4 million of them have problems -- things that contradict Wikipedia policies and guidelines. We should not be adding to that problem just because other problems exist. Instead we fix what we can as we find it all towards the goal of creating the best encyclopedia possible as defined by the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. If there are specific parts of your edits that you think are in line with Wikipedia policy/guidelines then bring those up here and achieve a consensus on them but don't just keep making the same edits just because you think they are OK. SQGibbon (talk) 23:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then explain to me why there's a problem with mine. She's in a new phase of her career which should be represented by itself, on it's own. Secondly, every wrestler has their themes listed in some way. For example, two of her themes are out on ITunes, and simply detective work will reveal the older ones. Therefore, I see nothing wrong with my edit. Evil Yugi (talk) 23:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There's plenty wrong with your edit. You object to two parts of the article: themes and not having a new section for her alliance with AJ, and so you make wholescale changes affecting the entire article? Why? What's you're justification for the rest of those edits? That's really not on in my opinion. That edit re-introudced unreliable sources, mdy date format in certain areas, when the majority of the article uses dmy, poor writing in several parts, forced image sizes, etc., etc.
As for your points, I've already explained a few times now that you can't use YouTube or wikipedia as a source, but you seem to have a case of the "didn't hear that"s. You say you can provide reliable sources for these themes? Do it. Provide reliable sources and re-add the themes with these sources to verify it. There is an [edit] link in the "In wrestling" section that can be used for such a change; a wholescale "Undid revision" is not necessary. As for the AJ thing needing a new section, I've already pointed out that 2 sentences do not need their own section. If it becomes more notable in the future, and something significant develops from it, then it may get it's own section. Until then it's unnecessary clutter. NiciVampireHeart 12:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Layla El. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]