Talk:LeRoy Bailey Jr.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal LeRoy Bailey Jr. is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Controversy on Criticism

Appears to lack of any of criticism and the style is akin to advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.187.119 (talk) 22:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, the majority of articles on Archbishops, patriarchs and the like lack crititism. There is such a thing as a good man.Dc 160 (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LeRoy Bailey → LeRoy Bailey Jr. — Simply put His name is LeRoy Bailey Jr. not LeRoy Bailey Sr. there's a difference, two different people. Essentially, This issue is one that revolves around consistency between Wikipedia and Wikiquote. Which lists him as Archbishop LeRoy Bailey Jr. Additionally what needs to be taken into consideration is how the Archbishop identifies himself, which is by the name LeRoy Bailey Jr. not LeRoy Bailey. On this clip at about the 2 min mark http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8_gKFCryJc(UTC.—Dc 160 (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Self Interest and Self Promotion.

This article typifies one of the problems which is bound to crop up in a project like Wikipedia. Just as advertisers are now opening pages on Facebook and Twitter the Reverand Bailey, or one of his supporters, has created this laudatory and excessive article with a view to improving or sustaining his status among his colleagues. Towit, we are informed in the article that Mr. Bailey appears on the evangelist 'circuit'; which begs the conclusion.

I hope that removing words like "tremendous" (three times) and the other changes I have made will re-instate the potential validity of including this article at all.

Of course there are good men. But surely a man who has ostensibly dedicated his life to the "Lord" would refuse to be praised so lavishly since the "Lord" is the more important individual in the duo and, ostensibly, the source of all things including the ability to preach and to promote money for new buildings. If, in fact, he is dedicated to living in the Christian spirit, and spreading the teachings that underlie that spirit, he must be aware of the Biblical warning that "They who shall put themselves first, they shall be last." Consequently, I am sure that a more moderate article can only be more pleasing to Mr. Bailey.

Andrew Thomas 2 (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]