Talk:Leander Schnerr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leander Schnerr in 1910
Leander Schnerr in 1910

Created by Guerillero (talk). Self-nominated at 14:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article: The article is new (created two days ago), properly sourced. Prose count checks. No issues with neutralityGreen tickY
  • Hook:The length of the hook is in order. The information checks with the two sources provided in the article about him being a survivor, and later becoming Archabbot. The article was an interesting an enjoyable read, and the hook caught my eye to the point I decided to review it!
  • Other:No issues with the image's license. QPQ still open.
@Guerillero: Awaiting for QPQ to close this nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GDuwen (talkcontribs)
The nomination is now complete! GDuwenHoller! 19:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P7 without image

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Leander Schnerr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links[edit]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

General[edit]

Review meta comments[edit]

  • I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)
    • No copyvio found, spot checks came up fine. Nicely done. If you enjoyed the review, feel free to take a look at some of my nominations, otherwise, congratulations, I shall pass this article now.Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.