Talk:Lee Spetner
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes needed
[edit]I recently added two template messages (rewrite and add references) due to the poor quality of the article. I improved the basic writing by trying to add an element of objectivity and neutrality, considering that the previous version was written in the tone of a fan or admirer. Still, the quick rewrite features the information given in the previous version, so references are still a priority. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.79.65.232 (talk) 09:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lee Spetner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/6998/6998_biograhies.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725094302/http://www.borhatorah.org/editions/14/bio-spetner.htm to http://www.borhatorah.org/editions/14/bio-spetner.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Common descent
[edit]This article states that Spetner claims that there is no scientific evidence for common descent. However, on p.132 of his book, “Not by Chance!”, he writes of Robert Williams and his colleagues that, “…they found a species of cat that has descended from the same ancestor, and has not changed much since.” I’ve read sections of this book, and have not encountered a denial of evolution or of common descent. 2A02:14F:1EF:C634:C113:4711:AA7:66C8 (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Biology articles
- Low-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- Start-Class Creationism articles
- Low-importance Creationism articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Start-Class Missouri articles
- Low-importance Missouri articles
- Start-Class St. Louis articles
- Low-importance St. Louis articles