Talk:Legal history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 18 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SHuynh1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How are decisions made in each civilization? Michimas (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How are decisions made in each civilization?Michimas (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2018 and 4 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bandit ellie17. Peer reviewers: Texans 2018.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last sentence of African section[edit]

I am no expert, but I find this very suspicious. It seems to have nothing to do with the rest of the section. Of the “major faiths that stayed” only Judaism has pre-colonial roots in Africa. I suspect that the three, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism would be relatively uncommon, the latter two especially outside of South Africa where there are at least Asian populations. Christianity and Islam, however, have pre-European colonial roots and are both common in Africa. Islamic law is influential in North Africa. So I can’t work out how this statement could be true or relevant on any reasonable interpretation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.22.212.186 (talk) 07:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Major Overhaul Planned[edit]

This page is missing citations and has minimal information on the academic discipline of legal history. This is somewhat of a shortcoming given legal history has so many inter-disciplinary connections and a long history. I am planning on giving this page an overhaul, adding citations, a history of legal history, academic methodology, 'professional associations', 'criticism' etc. If anyone has any suggestions or wants to help please comment below; I am not sure whether we should have a separate page for 'legal histories from around the world' to deal with substantive historical content as opposed to the study of those histories.

Also, a lot of the questions below seem to relate either to legal anthropology or comparative legal history. Although this is the page for 'legal history', it is more accurately described as 'national legal history', a distinct academic movement to the other two pages I have linked. 3D Gaius (talk) 08:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

Do non-civilized human societies have law? L Hamm 03:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello Fellow Wikipedians,

The page for Islamic Law is particularly short, and does not mention common terms for Islamic Law, Sharia(/ʃəˈriːə/, Arabic: شريعة‎ [ʃaˈriːʕah]), which means law in Arabic, or more redundantly the popular term, sharia law. Is there a reason for this exclusion, or was it simply overlooked in its description? WestleySturhan202202 (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Origin of law[edit]

Since the page origin of law covers substantially the same subject matter as legal history, I propose it should be merged here. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 04:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for revision[edit]

  • He, Peng (30 September 2013). Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783642395079. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  • Robin Bradley, Kar (2012). "Western Legal Prehistory: Reconstructing the Hidden Origins of Western Law and Civilization" (PDF). U. Ill. L. Rev. 2012: 1499. Retrieved 18 May 2016.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Legal history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legal history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How laws relate?[edit]

How are all these different laws tied together? They are all divided into their own section and talked about in further detail however, all laws, as we know, come full circle and are connected in some form. Some laws have influenced the creation of new ones. I would like to gain a little more insight on what exactly these laws have in common or how they might have influenced each other or built off of one another. Dhocine (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was misplaced at top of Talk page. David notMD (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of another section[edit]

The article is well, but I think you should tie all of these laws together because they all have some type of impact on one another. You could title the sub heading"In relation"O.Joness22 (talk) 16:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I see that wikipedia has a law in africa page, however this page defining legal history does not touch on the legal history of countries within or even africa as a whole. Is this something this page should touch upon?

RCBekah01 (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I see that there are no citations in the United States section. Is this something the page should add? Harnieri (talk) 02:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Are legal histories from around the world all connected or have some sort of connection?Drpencil9 (talk)

@Drpencil9: I am terribly sorry but talk page should not generally be used to discuss the article subject, per WP:NOTFORUM. JBchrch talk 22:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

I feel as if the United States section is lacking slightly and could be expanded upon, possibly the addition of how law has changed through the country's history, and maybe flushing out the specifics of the differences between states slightly more. WikiCar03 (talk) 02:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)WikiCar03 (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Regarding the organization of the article, I appreciate that it is divided into different regions or countries. However, I think it would perhaps make sense to group the legal history stemming from religions under one major header with different religions as subheadings. I think this section could come before or after the discussion of law in different regions, but just not in the middle where it is now.

ALR.kg23 (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is Jewish law not older than canon law?[edit]

The article claims canon law is the oldest continuously functioning legal system in the West, but that seems incorrect. Peaux (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legal_history&oldid=1199040975"