Talk:Lego Island 2: The Brickster's Revenge

Lego Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Chester Cheetah (2 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (12 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Bez-MX (9 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
International Hobo (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Lego Castle#Lego Knights' Kingdom|Cedric the Bull]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Game plot[edit]

While the article contains the story for the PC/Playstation version of the game in the Plot section, it does not cover the GBA and GBC versions of the story, which are extremely different (For instance, the Constructopedia doesn't play any part in the GBC version at all, other then a small mention by the Infomaniac). I own the game for PC, PS1, and GBC, however, I do not own the GBA version (Though I have played a little bit of it). There is a walkthrough of it on YouTube however, so I should be able to write a section on the GBA plot by watching that, unless somebody here owns it. Jamesster.LEGO (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"All plot" and other clean-up[edit]

Although it has been suggested that we expand upon the plot summary to cover the handheld versions, I have added {{All plot}} to the list of issues atop the page. As the article currently stands, it is mostly centered around the game's plot. I have slimmed the plot down a little as part of my clean-up edit, but I'm sure that such an in-depth summary is not needed and more extraneous information can be cut out.

More importantly, the article needs more expansive coverage of gameplay. I have moved two sentences from the plot to a new section for gameplay, but there is much more that can be written, especially considering this game's varied styles of mini-games.

To help with the lack of citations, I was able to provide one cited IGN review for the game. More reviews should also be included. I could not find the GameStop reviews referenced in the article; are these referring to professional reviews or merely user ratings?

A section on development could certainly be helpful; I know such sections are commonplace for a number of video game articles. Covering the info in these pages from the game's development team would be a good place to start start. --PeabodySam (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]