Jump to content

Talk:Leicestershire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

County hall

[edit]

I've spectacularly failed to find out where (and even if there was one) County Hall was prior to the one at Glenfield. I can't think of any obvious buildings - the best I can come up with in the Times archive is the Conway Buildings, which are given as an address for the County Treasurer (this now apparently used by the City Council) Morwen - Talk 19:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to a legal notice they inserted in the London Gazette on September 9, 1966 their adress was County Buildings, Grey Friars, Leicester

Lozleader 21:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That corresponds: Conway Buildings are at Greyfriars, also. Morwen - Talk 22:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IPA Pronunciation

[edit]

The current IPA pronunciation of ˈlɛstəʃə seems incorrect ('lesta-sha'). Locally it is pronounced 'lesta-sheer', which I think should be IPA: 'lɛstəʃɪər. Can anyone who knows more than me about IPA (shouldn't be difficult) confirm this? Thanks. --Michig 14:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both British RP and the English Midlands accent are non-rhotic, ie they don't add an extra "r" sound at the end of syllables (from their viewpoint of course). So ˈlɛstəʃə ('lesta-sha') or ˈlɛstəʃɪə ('lesta-shia') are both correct. LDHan 23:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GCSE Results

[edit]

Can it be clarified which year are these relating to, and where are they sourced from?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.50.184.130 (talk • contribs).

I have added a tag to this effect. If no references are provided, the information can be deleted.--Michig 12:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The figures come from the DCSF website. The DCSF provides results by district for any 5 GCSEs passed A-C, which I think is unreliable and optimistic, so I compiled a table of results using the DCSF results for 5 GCSEs including English and Maths. The table you see on the Leicestershire page is more truthful than the DCSF's set of tables. I'm doing you a favour, but sometimes the truth hurts. DinosaursLoveExistence 19:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a reliable source for the figures, please add it to the section as a reference. Thanks.--Michig 19:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Districts map

[edit]

The Oadby and Wigston and Harborough districts are labelled the wrong way round on the the map of districts. --Ebz 15:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected this - thanks for pointing it out.--Michig 15:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leicestershire and Rutland project

[edit]

I am seeking opinions on the setting up of a Leicestershire and Rutland project.

At its minimum, it is a good way of grouping articles, making it easier to maintain and improve them. With a few active members, it can become a useful area for localised discussion.

I am not specifically recruiting members at this stage. I am just seeing how much interest there is, and if editors think a project would be a worthwhile resource. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly think it would be worth the effort. Even if it wasn't particularly active, I like your idea of having a more effective way of grouping together articles than categories. Hoefully, a project would be active though. Nev1 (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've started making one. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 10:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leicestershire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leicestershire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes to dealing with UK counties

[edit]

Please check here [1] if anyone is interested. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

[edit]
County Flag of Leicestershire

WM Commons has three images of this flag which has no fox in it: perhaps it should be included.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

However it belongs to the Leicestershire County Council rather than the county itself.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the flag in the infobox is the county council's banner of arms. Leicestershire doesn't have a registered flag (yet). --Inops (talk) 17:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Parishes project

[edit]

I have started a project for missing civil parishes at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Leicestershire are:

And these exists as a redirect only but should have separate articles:

A total of 9, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (2)#Leicestershire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Leicestershire&oldid=1194928311"