Talk:Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unorphaned now (adopted?) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Patents_Co._v._Universal_Film_Manufacturing_Co., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawson_Chemical_Co._v._Rohm_%26_Haas_Co. and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mercoid_Cases all link to this page. TimothyRRColeman (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. There are at least 2 links to it. Plus a disambiguation reference to purgation. PraeceptorIP (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]