Jump to content

Talk:Lena Meyer-Landrut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLena Meyer-Landrut has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed
September 24, 2017Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Lena Meyer-Landrut/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Hi there! I'm bringing this up to GAR because I feel it does not meet the GA criteria anymore. I saw that the article was passed to GA in 2012, and there were a lot of changes in the following 5 years. First, the lead — apart from containing refs that are overfluous — is too short and does not summarize key points of the article. In the article's body, we have various unformatted refs and weird paragraphs. I believe sentences such as "The song debuted on #42 in german charts" are definitively not GA-worthy. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon network freak, it might help this reassessment if you notified the relevant editors, including primary contributors to the article and the original GA reviewer, plus the WikiProjects—these are the people who are most likely to address the issues you've raised so far and bring the article back into compliance with the GA criteria. Please don't close this until they've had a chance to find out that a reassessment is underway. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I see the article as making the treshold for GA inclusion. Still very comprehensive and sources are good.BabbaQ (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest closing this reassessment. I have given it a ressassment and found that there is no reason to demote this article. BabbaQ (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
BabbaQ, the lead is clearly too short per MOS:LEAD, and reading through it just now I found some clear issues with punctuation and prose, though nothing that couldn't be fixed by a copyedit, so I have requested one from the Guild of Copy Editors. I see no reason why there cannot be a favorable outcome before the end of March, but the reassessment should not be closed before the necessary work is done. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A copyedit by the Guild of Copy Editors has been completed, and as part of it the article's lead was expanded and the source citation format has been improved in many instances. Under the circumstances, I would say that the issues raised by Cartoon network freak in nominating the article here at GAR have likely been addressed (the copy editor certainly believes it to be at GA quality insofar as prose is concerned), which is the desired outcome of a GAR: that an article be brought back to GA level, and be retained as a GA. Cartoon network freak, if you wish it, I'll be happy to help you close this GAR. However, as you opened the reassessment, we need to hear from you soon if you think any issues remain. This reassessment has been open for five months, and if you think there's more work to be done, you need to be specific as to what is needed. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cartoon network freak: per above. AIRcorn (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't realized that it had been nearly three weeks. Let's give this through April 1, and if it hasn't been closed by then, I'll take it on myself to do so. Thanks, Aircorn, for going through all these. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cartoon Network is active so left a message at their talk page. Will see what happens. AIRcorn (talk) 00:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW the article seems in pretty decent shape as it is. AIRcorn (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! I'm really sorry that I didn't respond to your pings, but I kept forgetting to come here (I guess your comment on my talk page just ultimately reminded me about that ;). Regarding the article, I do believe it is in a much better shape now and this reassessment can be closed. As I do not know how to do that, could one of you do that for me? Would that be possible? Best of regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lena Meyer-Landrut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lena Meyer-Landrut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lena Meyer-Landrut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Henry and I like to to be with you

[edit]

P 105.112.219.125 (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lena_Meyer-Landrut&oldid=1250490333"