Talk:Lethbridge Collegiate Institute/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 28, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Reasonably well written

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   A number of dead links were found and tagged using this tool.

   Live links and off line sources appear to be RS

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just some dead links to be sorted out. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

   No effots has been made to fix the dead links, so I am delisting this now. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)