Jump to content

Talk:Li Xiannian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

...

[edit]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Title & Diacritics

[edit]

This page was moved back to Li Xiannian after I moved it to Lǐ Xiānniàn. The reason cited was "use standard latin letters", but I looked through the naming conventions, and could not find more than a vague guideline on a proposed naming convention page, and even that isn't clear as to what to do. Why not have the tones in the title? It's more accurate and specific. Most names that have special Latin characters are used in the title, like Lech Wałęsa, Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, Anders Jonas Ångström, Miyū Tsuzurahara, Mariko Kōda, etc. I think it looks better and is more specific if we have the plain Latin characters redirect to the specific pinyin name. Why not just make it Lee Shyennyen to make it easier for English speakers/readers/typers, then? --LakeHMM 04:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As this is the English language Wikipedia, and as such diacritics do not convey any information to English speakers, having them in the title does not help, but hinders as they are not easily accessible on standard keyboards. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biography

[edit]

Why does it say Li fell from power in the GPCR? He was reelected to the politburo in 1969, and as a result was the longest continually serving politburo member in post-1949 CCP history (1956-87). [1]DOR (HK) (talk) 10:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Editor, China Directory, 1979 Edition, Radiopress, Inc (Tokyo), September 1978, p. 501-502

File:Xiannian.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Xiannian.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Xiannian.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LiHua.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:LiHua.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:LiHua.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li.pgf.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Li.pgf.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Li.pgf.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li1992.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Li1992.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Li1992.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li1979.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Li1979.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Li1979.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libirthday.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Libirthday.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Libirthday.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality issues

[edit]

I have been busily cleaning up non-WP:NPOV edits by another editor, and quite frankly, the job is getting to be too much for one editor. Anyone else care to jump in and give a hand? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editor has been blocked as a sock puppet. Those edits have been reverted. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we should just revert way back to before Ana Susac started editing. I have very little faith in their interpretation of history.--Atlan (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I concur.WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Li Xiannian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]