Talk:Liability-driven investment strategy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge[edit]

I think that this merge should take place. The material in both articles covers the same subject so more redirecting than merging. --Stormbay 02:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --B. Wolterding 15:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

I removed the following line as I think it's very POV. Has no reference either 222.154.254.33 (talk) 03:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed there was no critical section in the puff piece article.2A02:C7C:E124:800:482B:3EC4:5E20:78D (talk) 08:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"This investment strategy is no longer affordable, at least in the financial sector."

IFRS17[edit]

There is no such thing. There is an IAS17, however it is concerned with leasing contract. --62.134.27.165 (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FRS17 is the UK GAAP standard for pension accounting. International accounting standards are called either IFRS or IAS (IFRS are newer standards, IAS are older). IAS 19 is the International accounting standard for employee benefits that covers pension accounting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.175.173.142 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pension / Gilts crisis[edit]

It makes sense to mention in this article the emergency Gilts purchases by Bank of England triggered by the LDI funds. Sissoko (2022, [1]) suggests that the entire LDI scheme was designed to eventually force the central bank's bail-out. Викидим (talk) 23:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly Wikipedia is not interested in anything that might present the Credit Bubble establishment in an unfavourable light2A02:C7C:E124:800:482B:3EC4:5E20:78D (talk) 08:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some new literature on the subject:

Bonizzi, Bruno; Churchill, Jennifer; Kaltenbrunner, Annina (2023-03-02). "UK pension funds' patience and liquidity in the age of market-based finance". New Political Economy. Informa UK Limited: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13563467.2023.2184469. ISSN 1356-3467. mostly approving, but page 4 allows to cut through the typical investment drivel by explaining the practical setup for the UK pension funds
Central Bank Monetary Policy Strategies amid Turmoil in the World Economy compact retelling of the whole debacle

Викидим (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of a Critical Section.[edit]

Why is there no Critical Section in the article? The article presents this investment approach as a good thing - with no criticism at all. 2A02:C7C:E124:800:482B:3EC4:5E20:78D (talk) 08:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]