This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 November 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our time → Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times – This article was moved from its original title without a consensus. The original move was made on the basis that the ending with "time" is the common name used and that 時代 should be translated as "time", not "times". If you check the sources given, including the first used to cite the original article title, or look up the quote on Google, nearly every article uses "times". In fact, Wikipedia is now one of the only websites that uses "time" instead of "times". I would also argue that in this context, "times" is an appropriate translation of 時代. If you disagree with my claim of common name, you can look up the quote on any search engine and/or check the sources in this article yourself. CentreLeftRight✉ 04:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. (t · c) buidhe05:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Case in point, a recent photo taken on 1 July 2020.
There are multiple translations of the original term and not one is solely "correct", so the best policy would be to go by the translation most commonly used (i.e. WP:COMMONNAME). WP:OFFICIAL does not always mean articles should be named according to government usage, especially if there are competing versions. The translation of the slogan used by the governments of China and Hong Kong is irrelevant if it is not commonly used by the people chanting or reporting on it in English. "Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times" is most commonly used within the sources in the article and by protesters at demonstrations, and if we look at some news sources published in the past 24 hours, this is still the case.
Comment - The word "liberate" in the proposed title "Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times" does not relfect the original Chinese text. I suppose "Reclaim Hong Kong, revolution of our times". --173.68.165.114 (talk) 00:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase "liberate" is well-established in translations; "reclaim" is not as common of a translation of the phrase. feminist (talk)05:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
