Jump to content

Talk:Liberty Theatre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former article saved to preserve edit history

[edit]

A old redirect has been saved in Talk:Liberty Theatre/Old redirect to preserve edit history going back to 2008, which may overlap the main article. See history. EdJohnston (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberty Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk22:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Liberty Theatre, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - QPQ needed
Overall: @Epicgenius: Article was assessed as a GA on 19 January, easily long enough and free of copyvios/close paraphrasing. Looks good to me, just needs QPQ. All hooks are reasonably interesting (some use offline sources); I prefer ALT 3 as a hook personally. (Please tell me if I've done anything wrong, this is my first DYK review!) Schminnte (talk contribs) 19:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Schminnte: Thanks for the review, and sorry for the late response - I completely forgot about this nomination. I have done a QPQ now. By the way, welcome to the DYK reviewing process; your review looks all good. Epicgenius (talk) 14:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go then. Schminnte (talk contribs) 15:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]