Talk:Library of Economics and Liberty

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
	Libertarianism portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

potential advertisement

I'm a bit curious why this page is marked as a potential advertisement while the Wikipedia page for, say, Bartleby.com is not.

Econlib.org's history is very similar to Bartleby.com's, only with an explicit emphasis on great classics of economics. Like Bartleby.com, it branched out to include a widely-used reference encyclopedia. It also branched out to include other media, such as podcasts with renowned economists, including Nobel Prize winners.

What about this entry has singled it out for looking like an advertisement? Why are the Wikipedia articles for, say, Amazon.com and Project Gutenberg not also labeled as advertisements? Why not Wikipedia's Democrat and Chronicle page--a small newspaper in Rochester, NY whose page looks more like advertising than the Econlib page? Why not the Economic Policy Institute page?

Is it a question of writing style?

The Econlib article passes all the criteria set out in Wikipedia's guidelines at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. It is written objectively and unbiasedly. Every sentence is third-party verifiable. It is not about a small group or garage-based company. The outside links are directly relevant and limited, analogous to those for the Wikipedia entries for corporations such as Amazon.com and Bartleby.com.

Marking it as potential advertising seems arbitrary.

As a friend and believer of Econlib, I have to say it did sound like an ad, though I'm not completely sure why. It's tacit. But I think most of this was due to writing style. May I make the following suggestions:

Group the information. General stuff first (like the sponsor), specific stuff later (like the content and audience).
Add headings and subheading to label said groups.
Back proclamations with citations (what is "popular"?).
Avoid phrases like "EconLib is devoted to..." Instead use "EconLib focuses on..." It's more objective.
Avoid reptitions ("It supplies educational resources for students, teachers, researchers, librarians, and aficionados of economic thought."...."Most EconLib site resources are oriented toward students and teachers in college, late high school, or early graduate school, with a focus on economics."
Sign your posts.

I've made a lot of changes to the article, including the removal of some items which I wasn't sure about. (Is it really valuable to say Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is a popular document to download?) Anything I took out could always be added later--best to be sure that the ad tag stays off. -David Youngberg 22:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Library of Economics and Liberty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060114090741/www.heraklia.fws1.com/contemporaries/cicero/ to http://oll.libertyfund.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]