Talk:Libyan Political Dialogue Forum

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Arab world

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Stephanie Williams[edit]

bit crazy that the main photo on this page is of Stephanie Williams. i think this should be changed for something libyan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalali (talk • contribs) 18:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with Williams' photo as a key facilitator, especially since she seems to be doing an excellent job. But obviously, for an intra-Libyan dialogue, it would be better to have photos of the Libyan participants, especially if these could represent the diverse socio-political components participating. Williams' photo could then be shifted to a less prominent place in the article. The most successful facilitator is one who makes him/herself useless. What would be needed would be:

reliable sources on names of key participants (UNSMIL and the media don't seem to want to publish the names); the names should then be added to the body of the article with the refs;
preferably these participants would be a mix from various backgrounds to avoid the impression that one group is favoured over another;
free-licensed photos hosted at the Commons.

I don't see much point in a group photo with no names, though that's just my personal preference.

Boud (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If a participant or observer of the LPDF makes a photo of Libyans in this Libyan-Libyan dialogue and publishes that at the Commons under a free licence, then we'll be able to use that. We can't show a photo that we don't have. Boud (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral colleges for selecting the unitary executive[edit]

Any info on the electoral colleges for selecting the unitary executive would be useful. It seems that LPDF participants know how the electoral colleges are defined or who they are, or else they would not have voted so much in favour. Boud (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]