Talk:Life Goes On (BTS song)

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Year-end list[edit]

LGO was included in The Line of Best Fit's The best songs of 2020 ranked article. This should be added to the page. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 21:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are required for contentious statements[edit]

Please ensure content that suggests this song was " the weakest number one in Hot 100 history" is supported by reliable sources explicitly stating that fact. Continually restoring the contentious statement without sourcing will only result in the material being removed.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it will likely also result in Angelwazza being blocked for edit warring. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 22:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I see I was right. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 22:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i don’t know why it bothers everyone so much that i add the “weakest number one in hot 100” history to the single’s commercial performance when it’s factual. No other number one single on the chart has only spent 3 weeks charting before falling off completely. I strongly urge that this be something we include in the songs commercial performance. Angelwazza (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it's factual then you can provide reliable sources that explicitly state as such, which has been requested from you repeatedly. At this point it's just your own unsourced commentary that is essentially original research.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can i add the lyrics (in english and romanized) ?[edit]

Because why not ? Alot of people out there want the lyrics so they can sing-along. So please tell me if thats a good idea. And have a nice day!^•_•^ Polly TheAnimalLover (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, the lyrics are not compatible with Wikipedia's licensing --Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 16:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]