Talk:Life unworthy of life

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Disability

Life unworthy of life is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Major Issue[edit]

Undoubtedly, this is an important Nazi concept to be presented. However, "lebensunwertes Leben" simply does not refer to Nazi mass killings and genocide justified by racist or political considerations. The two cited references are too weak to establish this link. This does not make the concept any better. It is important to keep the different motivations clearly separate - in only to clearly discuss any interrelations. Best regards, jan--Trinitrix (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Addition:

References: "The Nazi Docotors" is an important book by Lifton. It is not a book on ideological concepts, however. Cited from WP:

"His most influential books, Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima (1967), Home from the War: Vietnam Veterans—Neither Victims nor Executioners (1973), and The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide (1986), focused on the mental adaptations made by humans in extreme wartime environments—whether as survivors of atrocities or, in the latter case, perpetrators. In each case Lifton believed that the psychic fragmentation experienced by his subjects was an extreme form of the pathologies that arise in peacetime life due to the pressures and fears of modern society. [...] The Nazi Doctors was the first in-depth study of how medical professionals rationalized their participation in the Holocaust, from the early stages of the T-4 Euthanasia Program to the extermination camps."

So I think it is fair to say that the concept "lebensunwertes Leben" gave ideological justification to the T-4 program and anyone involved in it. But the justification for the genocide of the European jews, e.g., rested on other ideological foundations.

All material going beyond T-4 should be either removed or properly verified.

Best regards --Trinitrix (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People with learning disabilities[edit]

Surely this group of people should be included, alonside people with physical disabilities? Having said that, I'm not sure what the best phraseology is: I work in this field in the United Kingdom and the above phrase is the one felt (currently) to be appropriate: however, I'm aware that other idioms are used elsewhere in the world - some of which (such as "mentally retarded") would be seen as deeply offensive in the UK. Have I just bought and opened a can of worms? Dom Kaos (talk) 12:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've now changed "the physically disabled" to "people with disabilities", to reflect the fact that those with learning disabilities (UK term) were also victims, rather than just people mobility or sensory impairments Dom Kaos (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term is 'learning difficulties' (it was chosen by some people as a collective description if one was to be used) except that this is an inclusive term so is absent from the Community Care Act for obvious reasons. It is instructive that characteristics whish may have the effect of learning difficulties are criteria for abortion. Binding and Hoche live on.Keith-264 (talk) 10:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page was tagged for tone; I removed the word 'tragic.' Is it an improvement? I think it is a good idea to go into this philosophical concept because it explains the motivations and thinking behind the holocaust & related murder programs of the Nazis.

Slavs[edit]

They were never a main target of the National Socialists, it's like adding POW's to the list. Paulus Caesar

Yes they were Hitler Stated that Slavs were lesser races and should be salves or killed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.13.118.232 (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Planned parenthood[edit]

Even though abortion might be considered murder by some, it is certancly not as selective as the NAZI policy. Putting a link from this page to "Planned_Parenthood_of_America" implies otherwise.

Was this page written by a middle school student? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.3.15 (talk) 03:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poor translation[edit]

"Life unworthy of life" is a poor translation of this concept. The real meaning -- this is how it is understood by most Germans familiar with the history -- is "life unworthy of living", or "life unworthy of being lived". "Life unworthy of life" is circular and linguistically absurd, equally so in German. The very attachment of the term "euthanasia" to this programme indicates that this is how it was understood even by its perpetrators. Can we rename this article?--Rhombus (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may appear 'linguistically absurd', but it is commonly used - see Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. RashersTierney (talk) 21:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a professional English translator I have to say I agree with the first comment, at least as regards the English term - but not as regards the German one. German doesn't have a direct equivalent to English verbal nouns such as "living", and instead uses the infinitive form of the verb, which in this case just happens to match the word for the noun "life" ("Leben"). What this means is that the German phrase is clearer (less circular) to German-speakers than the over-literal English translation is to English-speakers - and that in turn means that the translation "life unworthy of life" is a poor one. The fact that it is commonly used simply tells me that not many English-speakers know German, and that people tend to copy what they've seen elsewhere. A poor translation is a poor translation, and the Internet is replete with them - especially as non-native users of English often take it upon themselves to post articles in English without getting them checked by native speakers. I've just come across the German phrase in a text I'm translating, and I instinctively rendered it as "life unworthy of living", with "life unworthy of being lived" as an even clearer, but more cumbersome, alternative. Then I wondered what Wikipedia had done with it, and found my way to this talk page.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've also just looked at the titles of the Spanish and Italian articles on the subject, and both mean "life unworthy of being lived" (Spanish "vida indigna de ser vivida", Italian "vita indegna di essere vissuta"). Both titles are in my opinion clearer, and hence better, than the English one - the more literal translations "vida indigna de vida" and "vita indegna di vita" would in fact be almost meaningless. In Spanish and Italian the "leben(s)-" part of "lebensunwertes" has correctly been recognised as a verb ("living", or "being lived") rather than a noun ("life"), whereas in English it has not.213.127.210.95 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Life unworthy of life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130310151949/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/mord.htm to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/mord.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More Issue[edit]

If Timothy Snyder is to believed then the notion of statelessness and the complete lack of protections that result from statelessness are more responsible for many killings in occupied Polend, and other regions, than any extension of the Aktion T4 program -- which was, by express permission of 'the fuhrer' and by experience, limited to the confines of the German state...which did not include Poland or any 'occupied' territor. Therefore, to say that any killings in Nazi Occupied Poland were a result of Aktion T4 is WRONG. It is better to say that Aktion T4 and the extra-judicial killings shared common goals, than to say one followed from the other. They shared similar aims, but were not part of the same program. This is is important because the Nazi's were not limited in their killing in one instance (Einsatzgruppen) and were limited -- at the least-- by a doctors order in the instance of 'Aktion T4.'— Preceding unsigned comment added by TreebeardTheEnt (talk • contribs) 01:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]