Talk:Lightweight programming language
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was moved to Lightweight programming language –Juliancolton | Talk 02:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Lightweight languages → Lightweight Programming Language — "lightweight languages" doesn't seem like correct entry -> plural + unclear it's from the computer domain EnTerr (talk) 06:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support move to Lightweight programming language, since it's not a proper noun. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support lowercased - not a proper noun. 81.110.104.91 (talk) 16:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Is this article notable?
[edit]The headline says it all. What do you think? Smlck19 (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- I am leaning towards no. Many of the individual languages (Forth, BASIC) listed are notable, but the concept of a lightweight programming language? Not so much. What is the criteria for inclusion? what is the definition of "lightweight" being used? Right now it is a catchall for WP:OR, including anything some random editor decided was lightweight. Why were Scratch, LEGO Mindstorms, and Arduino sketch language left out? Is Basic lightweight? Tiny Basic is but Power Basic and Pure Basic are not. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- So, what to do? Improve it or list it for deletion? The only good citation I found to support this article is Minimalist Language from WikiWikiWeb. Smlck19 (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- List it at WP:AfD. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think that this article could be merged into the list of programming languages by type as a section named minimal or lightweight programming languages. What about that? Smlck19 (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- What is the criteria for deciding which kind of programming language something is, and what source are we to use for that definition? With, say, object oriented programming languages or stack-based programming languages one can find multiple reliable sources sources that define the terms plus many sources that say things like "C++ is an object oriented programming language" or "Forth is a stack-based programming language". --Guy Macon (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- So, what to do? Improve it or list it for deletion? The only good citation I found to support this article is Minimalist Language from WikiWikiWeb. Smlck19 (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)