Talk:Lillesand–Flaksvand Line

Lillesand–Flaksvand Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the only non-industrial private railways of Norway never to be nationalized were the Holmestrand–Vittingfoss, Lier, Lillesand–Flaksvand, Nesttun–Os and Tønsberg–Eidsfoss lines?

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 27, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lillesand–Flaksvand Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments: I am concerned about the reliability of the sources. Besides Aspenberg , the rest of the sources comes from one website (which by the way, has a hidden trojan virus!). I am unable to ascertain if this site is reliable. Can you please provide me with more information on the site (as it is in Norwegian), and how it would comply with WP:RS? Thanks.

Thanks for the review. I was almost expecting this concern, and normally I would not regard this sort of site reliable. However, there are several indications that it is reliable. I would not consider this "high quality" enough for featured status, but it should be sufficient for GA:

The material is sourced, albeit not inline. The sources page indicates those newpaper articles and other literature that were used in compiling the information
The page is made by a headmaster; in addition to presenting factual information about the line, it contains a series of assignments for pupils. Given the scope of the site, it is probable that he has studied history at college/university level (although I cannot verify this).
As this is within the scope of local history, my impression is that the academic quality of this information is the same level as other local history research/writing.
The information provided is related solely to presenting uncontroversial historical facts, not producing research of any kind. Arsenikk ^(talk) 16:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments: Thank you for your explanation. I have checked with WP:RS and found that there are exceptions which can be accepted, and I believe this one of them. As such, I am confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as one. -- S Masters (talk) 06:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Lillesand–Flaksvand Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]