Talk:Lilly, Do You Want to Know a Secret?

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Does anyone know the time frame between the shooting of the first episode and the second? Miley looks noticeable older in the second episode compared to first. Missjessica254 16:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode article review notice[edit]

The individual episode articles for this series are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Hannah Montana episodes#2nd episode article review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 05:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hannah Montana Logo.PNG[edit]

The image Image:Hannah Montana Logo.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi lilly whatz up nothin chillin and you lilly how you beeen my lilttle sister likes you she loves you so much can i get your phone number or what lilly my lil sis haves a lot of your stuff like she likes you so much and i have 5 boy friends so many right i need to break up with all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.25.200 (talk) 18:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lilly, Do You Want to Know a Secret?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917154912/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=170&num=3813 to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=170&num=3813

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]