Talk:Lincoln's Inn Fields

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should the LSE and Essex Court Chambers really be mentioned? I think not. Every building on the fields is occupied by a company that regards itself as leading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.242.1 (talk) 11:45, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

If you edit this page, you might want to consider adding a little more about location or how to get there - people looking up a place are likely interested in going there 131.111.8.103 18:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Inigo Jones nor Central Park[edit]

The Inigo Jones and Central Park connections are spurious inventions. There is no reason to suppose Inigo Jones "laid out" Lincoln's Inn Fields even "in part". The London park that inspired the makers of Central Park was Hyde Park, a park for driving about in, as the histories of Central Park report. --Wetman (talk) 07:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"because Muslims beleive homeless people only need to eat during Ramadan." Citation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.31.142 (talk) 10:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lincoln's Inn Fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611232252/http://www.camden.gov.uk/print/ccm/content/leisure/outdoor-camden/parks/history-of-lincolns-inn-fields.en?page=6 to http://www.camden.gov.uk/print/ccm/content/leisure/outdoor-camden/parks/history-of-lincolns-inn-fields.en?page=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Powis house link[edit]

In the article you mention: "Another seventeenth-century survival is now 66 Lincoln's Inn Fields, which was built for Lord Powis and known as Powis House." when you click on the icon it takes you to a link for Powis house which was in a different location and which was demolished in the late 18th century.

i dont have the right information to which one is wrong but maybe just remove the link PSRinspect (talk) 12:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]