Talk:Lincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 13, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA review[edit]

Looks like good work here, after a few small....alterations that I made I don't think there's any outstanding POV problems, the lead seems fine and the organization seems adequate, its definently well-referenced, the picture looks to be ok and I don't see any MoS problems, and all in all, this looks to be a pretty good little article. If more material turns up to expand this article, I recommend splitting the history section into pre and post 1953 sections since desegregation seems to of changed the importance of the theater so much. Perhaps try to find some material on what genre of things the theater shows right now, that seems to be missing, unless its too sporadic with shows or something. Homestarmy 14:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I think I pretty much exhausted online sources and online newspaper archives. Any other sources will be found in print material, which will take time. --Aude (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Lincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA Sweeps: Pass[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It may be beneficial to look for any updates with the building, or see if there were any more recent stories in the news. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 19:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lincoln Theatre (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]