Talk:Lisdoonvarna/Kilshanny

Catholicism Low‑importance

Lisdoonvarna/Kilshanny is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parish[edit]

Per the clarification on the Corofin (parish) talk page, it appears that the standard naming convention for parishes is "Foo (parish)". Should this page conform to the revealed standard? Something like "Lisdoonvarna/Kilshanny (parish)". Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would that disambiguation be necessary? The Banner talk 14:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? To conform to the standard naming convention identified by yourself. In this case of course, it would not be a disambigation but a much-needed description. Who would know that Lisdoonvarna/Kilshanny was a parish instead of a nasty fungal infection? Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, you try to be disruptive to make a point. I advice you not to do that. After all those years, you should understand how disambiguation works. The Banner talk 17:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One source tag[edit]

@The Banner: Hi. One source tags are not necessarily for pages with specifically only one source; the tag itself even says "This article relies largely or entirely on a single source." There is one other source and it's only cited once; if you insist that "one source" must mean "one source and one source only", please just replace it with an {{refimprove}} tag instead of removing the tag entirely. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]