Talk:List of Asturian monarchs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions[edit]

I think it would be nice to make a few additions and improvements to this entry such as:

1. Add a flag for the Kingdom of Asturias if there is one for the period 714-924 (similar to the symbols/flags for Aragón and Navarra).

2. Add a brief introduction to the article to talk about the most important kings such as Pelayo, Fruela I, Alfonso II and Alfonso III.

3. It does not make much sense to have a timeline with a bar that goes from top to bottom in an ascending chronological order. It makes more sense to have a horizontal bar that proceeds from the 700s to the 900s from left to right which also eliminates unnecessary empty space on the page.

4. There are 2 family trees. The big one should be reduced to an image that looks like the small one. The small one is pointless since it covers Asturias but it also goes beyond Fruela II which is beyond the scope of this article. Also, the small one is practically redundant and unnecessary.

ICE77 (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The chart family tree is much to be preferred, not the image. Per WP:TEXTASIMAGES, Textual information should almost always be entered as text rather than as an image...Images are not searchable, are slower to download, and are unlikely to be read as text by devices for the visually impaired. Besides the chart can be easily edited by anyone in comparison with an image. --82.76.47.222 (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4. If that is the case then the image has no reason for being there and it should be removed.

ICE77 (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]