Talk:List of Copper Country mills

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A lot of mills

As a copper country history buff, I was surprised to find this article. Basically every mine which made it past the exploration stage (and some who didn't) had a mill. If complete, this article would be a list of every mine which once operated in the copper county, some repeatedly. For example, the Phoenix mine, in its many incarnations, had at least 4 mills. The Cliff had 3, the North American (a tiny and non-notable mine nearby) even had two of its own.

All of this is a long way of asking whether this article would simply become a List of Copper Country mines, which already exists -- both notable and non-notable -- would it be a useful article? -- dcclark (talk) 02:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]