Talk:List of Gemma Doyle Trilogy characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pippa's occupation[edit]

Untitled[edit]

She's a student/ evil ringleader? That's really not appropriate for the page. Neither are those ridiculous addresses in the girl's info boxes. --75.43.141.189 (talk) 01:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELP![edit]

YE GODS! This Page sucks! I'm doing what i can to make this awesome, but i need help. Please. -munkee_madness talk 08:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name meaning?[edit]

Is the meaning of each girl's name important to the book? Otherwise, it's kinda pointless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.62.217 (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes sense to have the name meanings there. It's often an interesting piece of info for the reader. AlmightyClam 16:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felicity's sexuality[edit]

Hey there. First, this page is great- a nice reference page for what are some of the best novels ever written. But, I'd like to correct something you said about Felicity Worthington. You said she is bisexual. Libba Bray herself has classified Felicity as a lesbian on her live journal blog.

“Was Felicity always gay/Were Fee and Pip always lovers?”

I always felt that Fee was gay and that she was in denial, thus the fling with Ithal and others. I don’t think it’s until she has the freedom of the realms that she begins to understand herself and her feelings for Pip.


I always felt that Pip’s sexuality might be more in flux. She doesn’t really know who she is or what she wants and wants people to tell her, which is part of what makes her so dangerous. She does love Fee but she enjoys toying with people—she enjoys having people want her. (She manipulates Bessie’s affections quite a bit.) But Felicity’s love for her is true and, as said, probably keeps Pip human a while longer past her “sell by” date.


Though there are hints along the way, I don’t think it’s until TSFT that they act on their feelings.

So there you go. A small matter, but still.

Thanks, Lenaslover —Preceding unsigned comment added by LenasLover (talkcontribs) 10:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Libbabraybeauty.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Libbabraybeauty.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters[edit]

A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Gemma Doyle Trilogy characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]