Talk:List of Italian film directors
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2009-03-05. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources. |
Untitled
[edit]Pregati, Paolo Taviani e Vittorio Taviani or Taviani Brothers or Paolo and Vittorio Taviani: biorgaphies needed. Hoverfish 13:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Complete?
[edit]Come on, how can we be sure this list is complete? And especially that it stays complete? --Thnidu (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Thnidu (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Red-links
[edit]Removed red-links as seen in this version per WP:CSC. Every entry should have its own non-redirect article in English Wikipedia to prove it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Please write the article first. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- The red links in this list (which I have not edited) were without references nor links to other language wikipedia entries, so a major clean-up was unavoidable. However, suggesting that the sufficient condition listed at WP:CSC of " Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect article in the English Wikipedia. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future." means that "Every entry should have its own non-redirect article in English Wikipedia to prove it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria." is fundamentally wrong. Afasmit (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- The WP:LISTPURP seems to be to organize articles (also WP:CLNT), i.e its own non-redirect articles. Unverified red links are against policy and a large number of verified red links are discouraged therefore every entree should have its own non-redirect article in English Wikipedia to prove it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria - it is also this list WP:LISTCRITERIA. There is nothing "fundamentally wrong" there. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)