This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
they say be bold. i had this on my watchlist as it seemed oddly written. now that its tagged, i thought id try to fix it. if someone has a better idea, please be bolder than me. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A suggestion : How about 2 lists : one of major characters and one of minor characters. Order them either alphabetically or in order of appearance in the novel. Lumos3 (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
well, since you ask, we really dont want lists of minor characters on WP (i know there are lots of those), unless the minor characters are subjects of independent commentary. for this novel, the main character and the historic figures are probably the few who are written about, but if this is sourced better, the rest could be justified. all i did was improve the format, i havent tried to justify the article itself. i did put the novel on the list of 10,000 vital articles.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
