This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
It's much more useful to be able to sort the list by surname than by first name. The way to do it is to use Template:Sortname if anybody can be bothered implementing this. Schwede66 19:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great idea. I'll start to do this. Big job though. ShakyIsles (talk) 22:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason for this? Columns are sortable, but because the names are not in a single table, you cannot compare (for example) highest run scorers or leading wicket takers overall; only of players who debuted in a particular decade. It's pretty easy to bring everything into a single table, but I wondered if there were any reasons/advantages of keeping it in the current format? Bs1jac (talk) 09:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]