Talk:List of One Tree Hill episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLCList of One Tree Hill episodes is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 18, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 3, 2008Featured list candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured list candidate

Brooking[edit]

I have of the term brooking related to the Brooke Davis character masturbating. But, when this phrase first start? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnum17x (talkcontribs) 04:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots[edit]

Screenshots, for each episodes is now available on Wikipedia, oth***.png

e.g. Season Three, Episode Eleven: oth311.png

And, for a promotional image, instead of a classic 'No Screenshot Available' image, oth000.png can be used for a One Tree Hill, feel.

UPDATE: Also, oth000b.png, oth000c.png, oth000d.png, oth000e.png, oth000f.png and oth000g.png are now available. Hpfan9374 06:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*** The three asterisks, should be replaced with production numbers.

New Screenshots[edit]

i am updating the small screenshots. (png is now jpg)

Old: Image:Oth305.png New: Image:Oth305.jpg Russell29

Temp page[edit]

Due to copyright i created a temporay page: Talk:List of One Tree Hill episodes/Temp -Russell29 19:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summarys[edit]

I am currently re-writing the page summarys, starting with the latest episodes and making my way to the pilot. This is because i dont want the pages to be lost to copyright. #

If you have changed a summary yourself and it is 100% original then put a hidden comment saying:

"Summary is 100% original - don not add summarys from other websites" Russell29 08:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode article review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result of the discussion was to redirect all of the episode articles except the pilot to this page's list of episodes.
initiated by Jack Merridew 10:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an episode review discussion that is intended to evaluate articles for individual episodes. See WP:TV-REVIEW and WP:EPISODE for more info.

Per WP:EPISODE, not every episode of a TV show should likely have an individual article. This can be for many reasons, such as notability or sources, or even just what format fits best for that show.

nb: rather than list the episodes here, please see the main page. Please note that there may be other episodes that, for whatever reasons, are not linked from that page.

All of the episode articles for One Tree Hill do not meet the guidelines and should be redirected to List of One Tree Hill episodes. If, during the course of this discussion, episodes are identified as meeting guidelines — due to new editing — they will be listed below; other episode articles will be redirected. --Jack Merridew 10:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes consensus found to meet guidelines
  • ...

Discussion[edit]

  • Best I can tell, so far, is that most of the season 2 episodes never had articles created. See also: Category:One Tree Hill episodes --Jack Merridew 10:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and Redirect all but the Pilot. I think it might be good form to always leave the Pilot, since there is good chance it will be notable. Other than that, nothing notable out the individual episodes. i said 05:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with I. Redirect all - leaving the pilot is ok by me. Eusebeus 12:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice to interested editors[edit]

This is a boilerplate bit of advice to editors of television episode articles which have come under Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review.

There is fairly widespread consensus that not all television episodes are sufficiently notable to merit articles of their own in Wikipedia. In the interest of fairness, the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process has been established, to determine whether it's possible to establish out-of-universe importance and real-world context for television episode articles. For example, after uncontroversial discussion here, articles on individual episodes of The Simple Life were turned into redirects to List of The Simple Life episodes.

If you're interested in keeping episode articles, the key thing is to find reliable sources discussing individual episodes. Sources which may help establish notability for these episodes include reviews in newspapers, discussion in specialist magazines, and detailed episode guides. (Some of my fellow editors feel that episode guides aren't sufficiently independent of the subject to establish notability, but I disagree, especially for professionally published episode guides.) The key thing for improvement of these articles is to include some real-world content (ratings are a good start) and information beyond plot summaries and cast lists. If there are any books published about this series, see if the production or impact of individual episodes are discussed, and add that information to the episode articles. If someone used sources like these books on a handful of these episode articles, to indicate that the episodes of this series have received sufficient coverage in reliable sources that any episode of the series could have encyclopedic coverage, I'd support leaving the other articles as they are, because the potential would have been demonstrated. I hope that interested editors will take up this challenge, and improve the articles so that they won't be redirected.—Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 21:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Tree Hill episode titles closed as a keep, but I'd rate it more as a no consensus debate. The reason for the AfD request was that One Tree Hill episode titles pretty much duplicates the purpose of this List of episodes, and most participating editors in the AfD agree with that. It was also brought up that the band information might be of interest, and that the band information is already present in the season articles. (I.e. back to square one of the AfD) So, do we want to redirect One Tree Hill episode titles here (i.e. no change to the LoE in itself) or display the band names here (as was doen two weeks ago[1]). I don't care, as long as One Tree Hill episode titles does not remain as a separate article. – sgeureka tc 16:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bands are included on the individual season pages as well, so if it's absolutely necessary that the bands and all the ep titles be united on one page, then merge it into this artle and redirect the list. Tomdobb (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This infornmation has no room in this article. It needs to just be deleted. I don't see any other TV shows listing the reason for each title, it's rediculous! Russell [(Talk) 16:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
also there clearly isn't any interest in the episode title article since no-one has entered a new episode all season. Russell [(Talk) 16:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all of it into one page for One Tree Hill —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.152.190 (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would the episode references still be kept if the article was merged? Christiancrambo (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has anything been done about this, like is it going ahead at all? Mjs2010 (talk) 07:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was wandering the same thing. It's clearly needed, a page of titles holds no bearing. Jayy008 (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of One Tree Hill episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of One Tree Hill episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]