Talk:List of Royal Enfield motorcycles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Turbo Twin[edit]

What about the oft-overlooked, Villiers-engined, RE 'Turbo Twin' ? 213.123.135.235 (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Royal Enfield motorcycles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is Royal Enfield entering a new segment with Hunter 350?[edit]

As we know Hunter 350 is lighter, a little smaller with more advanced features which is not what Royal Enfield used to work on. Also, plastic placement on the engine exact same as meteor and classic is a different approach. Do share your thoughts on the same. Jhanilesh28 (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is to discuss the article, not to gauge opinions. WP:NOTFORUM.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Cleanup[edit]

This article is in need of some serious cleanup. The section headers are confusing, and there are almost no inline citations in any of the tables. I don't have enough knowledge of the company to do a rewrite so I added some cleanup tags. Bass77talkcontribs 20:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and likewise I don't have current/enough knowledge. The content is a consequence of Indian IP addresses, often, so their motivation is to promote home products.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]