Talk:List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are not PAF Aircrafts[edit]

Cobra Helicopters are not belong to Pakistan AirForce...They are under use of Pakistan Army Aviation.

Infobox[edit]

The Military of Pakistan infobox appears to have no direct relationship with the article and I suggest it should be removed and/or replaced with something more appropriate - any comment please. MilborneOne (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

limite age in paf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.56.7.107 (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, that infobox has no business being there, which is why i removed it. cheers. Cheese1125 (talk) 22:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles about the same thing?[edit]

I'm not sure I have the authority to delete an article (haha, as a matter of fact, I don't know how), but either "List of aircraft of the Pakistani Air Force" OR "List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force" needs to be deleted. They're so similar that it doesn't even matter which one gets removed. Cheese1125 (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "List of aircraft of the Pakistani air force" should to be deleted. The title of the article should be "List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force". The name of the air force is "Pakistan Air Force", not "Pakistani Air Force" Hj108 (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

we need pictures of the air craft[edit]

there are no pictures of the aircraft show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Midgetman433 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JF-17 background Mirage 5 ROSE foreground.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:JF-17 background Mirage 5 ROSE foreground.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PAFF-86s.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:PAFF-86s.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SeaFuryT61 Pakistan 1948.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:SeaFuryT61 Pakistan 1948.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

F-16s issue[edit]

Re: [1] Moved from User_talk:Maxx786.

  • First
Agreement signed in March 2010 with United States for an additional 14 F-16s to be delivered by December 2012.
U.S. to provide 14 F-16 jet planes to Pakistan.News.xinhuanet.com (2010-03-27). Retrieved on 2012-07-01.

This source does not mention about "signing agreement". Only "The United States has agreed to provide another 14 F-16 jet planes to Pakistan till December this year". You can't tell if it's order, plan, either new or used - especially if it's Block 52, no word about delivery in December 2012. The most importent - there was no notification on www.dsca.osd.mil, so sale hasn't been concluded. Three years later it's very unclear.

  • Second
Pakistan receives F-16 planes from US - Pakistan received on Monday the last of the 18 ‘new buy’ F-16 fighter jets,
marking the conclusion of one part of the defence deal that is often flaunted as the icon of post-9/11 bilateral re-engagement.

[2] This source clarify it is F-16D block 52 airframe #10801 - first D-model produced in 2009, kept for testing & trials. It's not another 36th, it's 18th delivered.

  • Third
Letter of agreement for up to 45 F-16A/B Block 15 models with F100-PW-200 engines signed in December 1981
 F-16 Air Forces – Pakistan. F-16.net. Retrieved on 2012-07-01

In the source: "Peace Gate I - In December 1981, the government of Pakistan signed a letter of agreement for the purchase of up to 40 F-16A/B (28 F-16A and 12 F-16B) fighters for the Pakistan Fiza'ya (Pakistan Air Force, or PAF)". --SojerPL (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/falco-uav/
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/fc1xiaolongjf17thund/
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Semi-protection[edit]

Hi, As you can see, this page being related to Pakistan Air Force aircraft inventory is continuously being disrupted by 'fanboys' using unregistered IP's. Disruption is mostly in the form of inflation of numbers/ numbers vandalism and unsourced content. There is hardly an edit (by those IPs) which may be sourced or productive. So, I request semi-protection (or any appropriate protection) for this page for a long duration to protect its (already present) sourced content ...Thanks Maxx786 (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done if you want a page to be considered for protection, please apply at WP:requests for page protection - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Green tickY I have protected the page to encourage you all to come to consensus rather than edit war. MilborneOne (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of images and flags[edit]

User:Steelpillow had removed all aircraft images and flags. I have reverted back to old version. All edits and removal of images were done without consensus on talk page of the article. Faraz (talk) 00:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to this on the Project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation#List of aircraft of X Air Force/Military table formats, especially as related to images. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content of the Notes[edit]

I think there is far too much material in the Notes column of this list, so I have started a discussion about it here. Please make any comments in that discussion. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of aircraft of the Pakistan Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DEPROD[edit]

Updates are required![edit]

This page should be updated by the latest & most reliable sources i.e. flightglobal world air forces 2021. Some sources are also missing needed citations.Mtkhan1989 (talk) 05:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_active_Pakistan_Air_Force_aircraft&oldid=1219526659"