Talk:List of anti-ship missiles
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of anti-ship missiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420045723/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Klub.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Klub.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of anti-ship missiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027083308/http://www.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/3m51/3m51.shtml to http://www.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/3m51/3m51.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820154503/http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/sy2.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/sy2.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081019204828/http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hy2.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hy2.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230045412/http://sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/yj82k.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/yj82k.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Revert regarding Harba
[edit]Hi Oranjelo100 you reverted my edits removing the Harba missile and added a reference ([1]) to support it. The reference states that is a naval cruise missile and can get "surface to surface targets and ground assault". I see no mention of anti-ship capability. There exist many cruise missile systems which only have a Land-attack capability with no anti-ship capability. In my opinion, it is pure synthesis on your part to include this system in this list. We should wait for a more confirmation or news about the system before classifying them. Adamgerber80 (talk) 09:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Added another link. Many sources call it anti-ship missile. Oranjelo100 (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)