Talk:List of banks in Kosovo
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Licencing
[edit]Because this is an encyclopedia, where information must be factual, and must aim at truth, this article, like all the other serious articles, must contain a list of banks accredited by the Central Bank of Kosovo. A correct list may be found at the Central Bank's official website: http://www.bqk-kos.org/shqip/Bankat%20Komerciale.htm. I think the article needs to be edited accordingly.--Arbër T • ? 11:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Removal
[edit]I dont see any reason to remove institutions that operate in Kosovo. This article is about banks in Kosovo. So it should have list of banks that operate in Kosovo. No matter if you like it or not. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 10:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't believe my eyes reading this! National Bank of Serbia, I mean, hello?? That is another country. They do not regulate ANYTHING in Kosovo. Dinars are illegal and INSULTING tender, nobody wants to look at them even. The Serb government has no power over Kosovo and has even de facto recognized Kosovo's government as legit in Kosovo, now you're tleling me they organzie the banks in the pockets where they live. I'm sorry but that is just POV pushing. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- It would seem to me that there must be a balanced way to mention what Newquartermaster refers to as "illegitimate" banks while at the same time mentioning that the people and/or the government of Kosovo do not recognize the validity of these institutions. Is there an article about this controversy somewhere that can be linked to? --Non-Dropframe talk 12:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Ping Anastan
- Yes, Brussels Agreement (2013). It outlines what Kosovo is and how Serbia recognizes it. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- See also Stabilisation and Association Process. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am trying to say that the National Bank of Serbia has no more influence in Kosovo than the National Bank of France has in Malaysia. They are DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with the fact that these banks are probably not legal banking institutions in the eyes of the national government. However, if some guy pitched a tent in my living room, although I may not recognize him as a legal tenant, that doesn't mean he doesn't exist. See what I'm saying? I believe the article should draw a distinction between those institutions that are and are not recognized by the government but do so in a way that is stating only the facts, stating that the government does not recognize them (citable fact) rather than simply labeling them as "illegal." --Non-Dropframe talk 12:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am trying to say that the National Bank of Serbia has no more influence in Kosovo than the National Bank of France has in Malaysia. They are DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- It would seem to me that there must be a balanced way to mention what Newquartermaster refers to as "illegitimate" banks while at the same time mentioning that the people and/or the government of Kosovo do not recognize the validity of these institutions. Is there an article about this controversy somewhere that can be linked to? --Non-Dropframe talk 12:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Ping Anastan
@Newquartermaster. Have you read WP:NPOV? When you use block capitals, it is SHOUTING. That is what is seems you do when specifying "different countries". I have no idea as to the legality of the Bank of Serbia within Kosovo's framework though I am certain that anything taking place on the premise of Kosovo especially with regards the Serbian population will definitely be with the knowledge and approval of Priština and Belgrade. That said, per NPOV the procedure remains neither to treat Kosovo and Serbia as two countries, nor to treat Kosovo as a Serbian province. Yes we have to be verbose at times but it is the only way to respect all viewpoints. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 22:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Since 2013, Serbia has recognized Kosovo. It has renounced its claims to the state when it signed the Brussels Agreement in return for increased autonomy in the northern region where ethnic Serbs are a slight majority over Albanian. Sources say they are different countries, and Kosovo is recognized by the majority of world countries. What can be simpler than that? Newquartermaster (talk) 11:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Since 2013, Serbia has not recognised Kosovo, and has renounced nothing. As for sources saying "different countries", that as we know is irrelevant on any NPOV matter. There is no single conclusive reference for disputes. In any case, how sources are used depends on what it is being stated. In your case it is that there are no Serbian banks in Kosovo. I very much doubt a source to call Kosovo an "independent sovereign state" will support this claim. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 09:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of banks in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518075056/http://www.contactphone.net/dunav-banka-ad-zvecan.html to http://www.contactphone.net/dunav-banka-ad-zvecan.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)