Talk:List of book arts centers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

creation of this page

I've taken the information on this page wholesale from the entry 'artist's book' (it constituted a subsection of that article), as (a) much of the text tends towards the promotional, and (b) it deserves its own pages and the artist's book definition deserves to be much more succinct and uncluttered. See the talk page at 'artist's book' for more details.

Further, the most significant entries on this page should probably each have their own article and should also be added to the categories of 'artists books' and/or of 'book arts' and/or of 'artists books and multiples'. Once that work is done, this page should probably be deleted.

Also, much of the info here is taken directly from institutions' websites (it's all blurbs!) and needs to be rewritten for NPOV.

Emily Artinian (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 -- Edits, sourcing and notability

I question edits made by at least two editors -- User:OneMarkus and User:Artintegrated -- to this and other articles about artists and organizations of questionable notability. As edits I have made related to WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:N and other Wikipedia policy and guidelines have been reverted, I have started discussions here and on other related talk pages to discuss the future edits and existence of these articles. Flowanda | Talk 05:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the old thread above says, this whole page needs drastic cleanup for neutrality and external links. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And as native German, I would be pleased if the German Part of BookArt could find a place as well. --Galileo1642 (talk) 15:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixup

I started to try to fix this article up. its more like our bibliographies, as it lists a lot of items that are themselves not notable enough for their own article. promotional language needs to be removed, and items simply listed. I added a lead, and some guidelines for inclusion, in addition to renaming it. I dont actually think its salvageable, but i can make it less offensive.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:19, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of book arts centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070909123659/http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/programs/exhibitions/kmg/2005/lost_found.html to http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/programs/exhibitions/kmg/2005/lost_found.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of book arts centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]