Talk:List of clinical psychologists

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indexes

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled

Why Freud? Sigmund was a psychiatrist, not psychologist. Anna did not have any advanced degree to speak of. Of course, I realize that this was before the days (daze?!?) of accreditation and graduate programs - but still - would she really qualify as a "clinical psychologist?" Theguyinblue 20:31, 2 Aug 2007

I've removed Gordon Allport from the list. He's a social psychologist, not clinical. You may argue that some of his contributions are useful for clinical psychology, but that doesn't make him a clinical psychologist. If some of his contributions had also aided in some way to forensic psychology, for example, that wouldn't make him a forensic psychologist either. If you wanna make another page with psychologists who've aided or somehow contributed to the development of clinical psychology, it'd be different. Raystorm 12:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allport saw clients in addition to writing and teaching. He should be listed as a social psychologist but ALSO as a clinical psychologist (he worked with people in a clinical setting doing psychology). They are not mutually exclusive. Steve 15:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He did? I was not aware of this. Did he see them in a clinical setting? If so, I remove my objection. Cheers Raystorm 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought he did, but I can't remember why I thought that and I've gone out on the web and it looks like it might have been a figment of my imagination. Sorry. Steve 23:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed Philip Zimbardo, he is also a social psychologist, not clinical. Zfranco 07:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I restored Zimbardo. He worked with clients, i.e., in a clinical setting. That makes him a clinical psychologist and it doesn't matter that he is also a social psychologist - the two are not mutally exclusive.Steve 15:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed I. Pavlov, not a clinical psychologist in the traditional sense. I think he fits better in other categories. Zfranco 07:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did he ever work in a clinical setting or only research and teaching?Steve 15:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steve, I agree that they are not mutually exclusive, but in general, if he was working with clients it was with practising or research clinical psychologists present. Although he did hold a license until recently, I don't think he thinks of himself as a clinical psychologist. Both Zimbardo and Pavlov get at my question of how we define a clinical psychologist. By primary occupation? By holding a license to practise clinical psychology? By saying they are a therapist? Is an experimental psychologist whose findings have clinical application then also included in this list as a clinical psychologist because they have worked in a clinical setting? Zfranco 19:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Jung perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.5.227.196 (talk) 22:14, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:List of clinical psychologists/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I've added several luminary clinical psychologists to the list. I think we need some criteria to decide who goes on the list. Also, it would help to know what their major contributions are on this page. Maybe listed after their names. Zfranco 07:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 07:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 22:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)