Talk:List of collieries in Lancashire since 1854

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cloughside colliery[edit]

Maps show this to be the same as outwood colliery, it started as cloughside but later changed its name to Outwood. Is there another cloughside in Prestwich, or is this the same colliery? Parrot of Doom (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for moving content[edit]

The title of this article suggests a list. Much of the useful and relevant content preceding the list might better be presented on the page Lancashire Coalfield in common with other British coalfields, with links between the two pages. I'll go ahead amd move that material if others think that appropriate just leaving the lists and explanatory text here. cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As original author I don't have any problem with that, at least it helps a stub to be filled out a little.Geotek (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The divisions in the list are a bit alarming, administratively and geographically - for instance - Birtles is near Rochdale but in the Bury Area's list, and Hollinwood (eg Bower colliery), in Rochdale's list is actually the other side of Oldham! Would it not be better to list them by sections relating to today's Boroughs? I would suggest a section for Rossendale (Bacup/Newchurch etc), and possibly combining Wigan & Leigh's lists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.114.237 (talk) 13:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the concern about the way the divisions are laid out but it is done that way to correspond with the original Inspector of Mines reports and area designations. Changing those divisions to suit modern area boundaries would only serve to confuse anyone looking for information in the historical context. Geotek (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I very much disagree. I have sorted the sections into smaller areas which I think is more useful to the reader and gives a much clearer indication of the colliery locations and the historical context. There is considerable duplication which I will attempt to address. J3Mrs (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mining in West Lancashire[edit]

This is interesting material referenced to what appears to be a talk or lecture. It really isn't appropriate here but I don't think it has the references for a stand alone article. Any ideas for referencing or indeed hiving it off.--J3Mrs (talk) 15:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind 'appropriate', it isn't even correct. It states, "The list has been compiled from the official reports of the Mines Inspector and lists of mines produced by National Coal Board and the Coal Authority" which cannot be possible, as the Ashton in Makerfield collieries listed here were in the St.Helens 'Number 3 Area', as well as Golborne Colliery, they were not in Wigan area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.94.142 (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of collieries in Lancashire since 1854. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100801022159/http://www.suttonbeauty.org.uk/suttonhistory/bold_colliery.html to http://www.suttonbeauty.org.uk/suttonhistory/bold_colliery.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]