Talk:List of comets by type

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comprehensive but not easy to navigate.

This is certainly a comprehensive list, but on my tablet it was difficult to scroll through. Can this be improved upon? Richard Nowell (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've considered dividing into sections, and added an extra navigation section at the top, but I understand your issue with navigating through the article as a whole. I might be inclined to break it up if that's generally in everyone' best interest. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Split - Article is over 600 kB and therefore should be split. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the process of doing it, just slowly. I've already put parts of it into List of numbered comets, List of periodic comets, and List of non-periodic comets. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 23:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

someone make collapsible lists

You know, with [Hide] and [Show] buttons. Just a suggestion. Huritisho (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, I'll do it Huritisho (talk) 19:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page length

At 600,549 bytes at the time of writing, this page is too long. What's the best way to split it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support split per exoplanetaryscience's suggestions, with {{See also}}s to each split-off article at the top of each split-off article. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 14:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's down to 38k, and while I probably could split out some of the remaining longish lists, that would require actually creating pages as opposed to copy/pasting/updating existing lists. Primefac (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]