Talk:List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Alliance Defending Freedom was copied or moved into List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Alliance Defending Freedom's first landmark case was the 1995 US Supreme Court lawsuit Rosenberger v. University of Virginia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom.

Wikipedia

"Important precedent":NPOV problem[edit]

I have marked Masterpiece Cakeshop's entry as being POV. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 00:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lionelt (talk · contribs), please, take your edits here, first.

Accidentally left ref off of last edit. POV issue is resolved.– Lionel^(talk) 03:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so..."Important", to me, sounds like a value judgment. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 03:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In this case it is not a value judgment. It is objective. OED defines landmark as "An event or discovery marking an important stage or turning point in something."[1] Source says "[Masterpiece Cakeshop] could be a landmark..." Thus use of "important" in the article is acceptable.– Lionel^(talk) 04:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll add "according to [the source]", in exchange for removal of the tag. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Nice doing business with you.– Lionel^(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]