Talk:List of diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article[edit]

There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 23:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ack[edit]

Sorry for the edit summary. My closing bracket got cut off. --Blehfu (talk) 05:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Layout[edit]

This article could be so much better, look at List of diplomatic missions in Ottawa and then compare it to this. The articles are there, if there could only be a table like in 'List of diplomatic missions in Ottawa' then this would be excellent. 95jb14 (talk) 16:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the Ottawa list is a branch from List of diplomatic missions in Canada. 198.161.32.150 (talk) 00:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Libya[edit]

The Libyan embassy in London will re-open today (9-8-11) under control of the National Transitionl Council. I suggest that we add this embassy to the embassies/ high commissions section using the 1951 Libyan flag and the description "Libya (NTC)". e.g.

Libya Libya (NTC) [1]

References

Why Exclude Vice- Consulates[edit]

Vice- consulates are run by full time staff, why are they excluded? Are there even any Vice- counsulates in the UK? 94.2.130.29 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

proposal to change link structure[edit]

I was thinking of changing the links so that rather then linking to the country itself it goes to the 'the embassy of X in London' instead (as the links in the drop-down box do). I was going to make a page for each embassy, and as I've recently moved down to London will go around and take a photo for each one to make it look better. Should be good when it's all finished.

Sdrawkcab (talk) 23:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)sdrawkcab[reply]

Update[edit]

I've updated the lists on this page in line with the most recent Diplomatic List on the FCO website (October 2013). I've also added a section for Honorary Consuls and one for states with no representation, and have added also all the embassies to the box at the bottom, with a page for each one coming in due course.

Sdrawkcab (talk) 23:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)sdrawkcab[reply]

Honorary Consuls[edit]

Hi, I didn't realise HC's are not included on these sorts of pages. My main idea was to include all states on this page, including one's with no representation in the UK. I would have to put the HC states now in the 'no representation', but surely strictly speaking this is not true if they have a HC....

Sdrawkcab (talk) 22:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)sdrawkcab[reply]

Have added them to the 'unrepresented' list with a note as appropriate Sdrawkcab (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)sdrawkcab[reply]

Just a reminder![edit]

Hi! I just made a change that it's not possible to travel to Tehran at all, if we will go to the Syrian Embassy accredited to the United Kingdom. What I wanted to tell you that the easiest way to go to Syrian Embassy accredited to the United Kingdom is in Moscow. Please, accept it! ;) --62.63.238.28 (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]