Talk:List of expeditions of Muhammad/Vote

This page will be used to discuss and vote on the proposal put forward by Eperoton (talk · contribs) for the List of expeditions of Muhammad.

The proposal can be found here.

Vote[edit]

Change the article's title[edit]

To something like "List of expeditions under Muhammad" or "List of early Muslim expeditions" to allow the inclusion of non-military expeditions (reconnaissance missions?).

Neutral. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - You can make a separate article for that. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The use of Watt's table as the basis for including/excluding expeditions[edit]

Neutral. I think any reliable reference will do. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the "Muhammad's order and reason for expedition" column[edit]

Support. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The conflicts are often too complex to be summed up in one sentence or a few sentences. This should be left for the individual articles to deal with the complex matters. Other lists such as List of World War I battles and List of World War II battles do not include such information. Not to mention that the current version contains a lot of primary sources and misattributed sources. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the "Casualties description" column[edit]

Support. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - once again, this should be left for the individual articles, which should deal with the complexities involved in each expedition. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

A proposal should be whether or not the old version should be kept. Why is there not that option here? Rigged from the beginning. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be opposing all suggested changes. Btw, you must be dreaming if you think that "your version" (the one you mindlessly copied from wikiislam.net) will remain as is. Al-Andalusi (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wont at all get involved with this rigged vote. I urge others not to either. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, your accusations are not justified. Personal attacks don't bring about effective dialogue. Xtremedood (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]