Jump to content

Talk:List of former Masonic buildings in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of former Masonic buildings in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on List of former Masonic buildings in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

disputed info

[edit]

Besides the literal question marks included in the article, and unsupported assertions of when various local clubs had meetings or not, there is at least one outright probably-false statement in the article, that "All have subsequently been sold, and have been converted to non-Masonic use". I simply do not believe that, and it is not supported.

Disagreement about this will be mooted if the ongoing merger concludes and this is just dropped in the merger. --Doncram (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I further just added three {{disputed inline}} tags in the Arkansas section. One for false statement that a given building is commercial, which is not what the given source suggests, and two for completely unsupported assertions apparently based upon an editor's failure to find information. Better not to assert anything at all. I won't do much more of this.
It is just slipshod stuff, not worthy of mainspace, meant by one editor to support "former" vs. "current" list. I don't welcome maintaining any such distinction. Unlike for Roman Catholic churches where a diocese may provide definitive information, and unlike for Carnegie libraries which are public libraries, it is simply not always feasible to know who owns or operates a given Masonic building. That's what Masonry is about, being secret, seriously. Demonstrated by numerous question marks and notes of "unknown", even by an editor bent on finding any support at all, whether reliable or not. --Doncram (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per http://www.argrandlodge.com/find-a-lodge, the El Dorado Lodge is active at the given location. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Hampton building is currently a library: http://www.calcolibrary.com/about-mission/ --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And the Yell Lodge listed on the AR Grand Lodge page seems to be 10 miles away from the location in the article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If El Dorado is active at the historic building, please move it to the other list.
As for the secrecy crap... Grand lodges maintain websites with the locations of lodges listed. It is easy to check if a given building is being used for Masonic purposes or not. Blueboar (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]