Talk:List of former championships in WWE

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of former championships in WWE article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

List of former championships in WWE is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 20, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the last 50 years, 17 championships have been retired by current professional wrestling company World Wrestling Entertainment?

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Professional wrestling Mid‑importance

	List of former championships in WWE is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WWF Women's Tag Team Championship

Some more research is needed on this. It lists the creation as 1970 with the initial champions being Velvet McIntyre and Princess Victoria. Considering that Velvet McIntyre was born in 1962 and Princess Victoria didn't even debut until 1980 this can't be correct. I don't think Princess Victoria traveled back in time to 1970 to capture a title with an 8 year old Velvet McIntyre.

World Championship Heavyweight Title.

I believe the article is mistaken, the wcw heavyweight title was not retired it was unified with the wwe championship. Sid 4x (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases, it's the same thing. (retired when unified)

For more information see Talk:World Wrestling Entertainment and the About the argument concerning the WWE/World Tag Team Championship & Unified WWE Tag Team Championship... response entitled Allow me to explain this better ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 02:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

The List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment will likely be delisted as a Featured List, with the recomendation that it be merged with this page. The current champions page was pretty much just created so that it could be the main article for a Featured Topic on WWE championships.

I think it would be quite useful to merge the two pages. I don't think a lot of changes would be needed. The list portion of the current champions list could simply be copied here and given its own section. Then, the lead would need to be adjusted, and the page moved to "List of World Wrestling Entertainment championships". -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 20:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, List of World Wrestling Entertainment championships is a great way to show all the championships that were/is defended during the company's history as a wrestling promotion. I say, let's merge.--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree if its done right it could easily be a Featured List in a matter of days.--SteamIron 03:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I've been involved with FLC, so I'm unsure what the current procedure is, but I don't think another FLC would be needed. The changes can just be made here, which is already a FL. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think an article would be better than a list. Just my opinion. It reviews the topic much better. Like I've shown already here.--WillC 07:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that's not an article. It's just a list, followed by a bunch of sections with redirects. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is the format layout, I have yet to work on it. Want to see what it would be more like look at TNA Bound for Glory.--WillC 05:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree - if you merge both, this will be a long ass article/list (whatever you want to call it). Look at all this history that was written in prose about the titles and if you want to merge that with the current champions list (which has no prose about the histories and for consistency it would need it) then it will clutter everything IMO. Unless, there is a more precise way of putting these two together, I disagree for now. --Truco ⁵⁰³ 18:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree I think the idea is stupid. One article is about the FORMER Championships, the other article is about the CURRENT Champions! It makes no sense! Kepp it like it is!

--Hixteilchen (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this sentiment. These articles cover two distinctly different topics, one detailing current information, one containing historical data. Also, this article discusses the championship categories, while the "Current Champions" article covers the individuals holding the various extant championships. HappyJake (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - A combined list would be too long. Splitting on the current/former border is a logical way to keep the articles/lists at a manageable length. It also helps avoid issues where the former championships are overshadowed, thereby avoiding WP:RECENTISM concerns. oknazevad (talk) 03:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WCW & ECW World titles

By the time they were retired by the WWE, these two titles, if ever, did not have the word "Heavyweight" in their on screen graphic or ring name. Might as well then call the European title a WWF title still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.221.54 (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FCW Championships

How come FCW titles aren't in the list? It was WWE's developmental territory, so wasn't part of WWE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk) 07:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike NXT, which is outright owned by WWE, FCW was separately owned and only affiliated with WWE, much like Smokey Mountain, OVW and Deep South had been before. WWE bought out the F W owners when they changed it to NXT, making it fully part of WWE, albeit a separate operating unit. oknazevad (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of former championships in WWE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of former championships in WWE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://corporate.wwe.com/company/events.jsp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050828211610/http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/wwechampionship/30445411 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/wwechampionship/30445411
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109092104/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/retired-championships to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/retired-championships

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Championship?

So I know what you're thinking "Bro, this wasn't a real championship" and you'd be right, however, neither was the Million Dollar Championship and it's listed. Both were unsanctioned "gimmick" championships. While it's true the Million Dollar title is far more noteworthy, the Internet Championship was defended on at least one house show and was included in the WWE 2K games with the other WWE Titles. Personally, I'm not really sure if that justifies an inclusion, however, it was defended in a WWE ring and there's a precedent for including gimmick titles so we need to be consistent. I'm curious about what everyone else thinks. 174.125.60.159 (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should NWA US TV Title Be Recognized As Official Title

I don’t see any official WWE source i.e. WWE.com or WWE Encyclopedia that acknowledged this title’s existence either by itself or in any of the bios for the listed champions. The only sourcing I see is Wrestling Titles.com. So, should this be included in the official title history of former championships in WWE? WrestlingFan1203 (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where Are SMW Tag Titles

Shouldn’t the SMW Tag titles be included in the championships used by WWE section since they were defended in WWE and even had the title change at Survivor Series 1993? WrestlingFan1203 (talk) 06:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Royal Rumble Championship

Even though it only existed for one night, I think the championship should be included as it was officially introduced as a sanctioned championship on WWE tv plus Braun is recognized as champion in his WWE bio. At one point, I believe it was also listed on WWE.com with other former titles as well. WrestlingFan1203 (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]