Talk:List of hills in San Francisco

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dave Schweisguth 21:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC):[reply]

Untitled

This list is from the "Hills" chapter of "San Francisco Almanac". It's incomplete even considering only that book, as a) there are other hills in the "Place Names" chapter and b) SFA missed a few. See my http://sfgazetteer.com/how-many-hills-in-san-francisco.html for my list. Someone should reach their own (consistent, defensible) criteria as to what this page should list and add hills which are missing according to those criteria. I might someday, although it seems a little forward to do so right now.

Re citing, my article isn't a great cite, since it's just on the web. It seems more helpful right now to leave it in rather than to remove it. Eventually someone ought to get print citations for all of the hills not already in one of the other print citations.

Seven? 55? Huh?

Something seems wrong with this line: "When people talk about the 'Seven Hills' of San Francisco, they refer to the 55 original hills: Telegraph Hill, Nob Hill, Russian Hill, Rincon Hill, Mount Sutro, Twin Peaks and Mount Davidson." Seven hills are listed following the colon, not 55. So what's the number 55 doing there? Either some words are missing, or some words should be eliminated. For example, this revised version would make more sense: "When people talk about the 'Seven Hills' of San Francisco, they refer to these hills: Telegraph Hill, Nob Hill, Russian Hill, Rincon Hill, Mount Sutro, Twin Peaks and Mount Davidson." Benccc (talk) 06:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, stumbled over the same thing and changed it. 84.44.244.234 (talk) 13:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a candidate criterion

A column for topographic prominence would be good to have. How to get it without WP:OR I have no idea. —Tamfang (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

table

Is it possible to add a column that numbers the rows, so that I may know which is the 7th in alphabetic order or the 9th in height one? thanks. 151.29.89.211 (talk) 08:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the list misses the Bay View Heights of the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.29.138.86 (talk) 14:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that Bay View is the same of Candlestick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.29.138.86 (talk) 07:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]