Talk:List of historic places in the Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no objection. However, I'm not going to spend time actually performing all these moves myself, so someone else please do it. -- tariqabjotu 00:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– All these names require "the" before the name, they are not like county names; standard usage/idiom. This was applied to other categories a long time ago, this one must have been missed, or has been created since by someone unfamiliar with the proper usage. --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 06:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Skookum1 (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would someone else please, once these moves are done, go through all the ledes on these and add "the" before the regional district name. I have high blood pressure and need to rest, it took a long time to do this just now and need to chill. Other lists of this type may exist and should also be changed as well.Skookum1 (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment Regional districts do not generate such lists, as always I have my reservations about the use of RDs to subdivide BC for things that have nothing to do with regional district governance; this is a case in point, but too much work and procedural b.s. to bother with. But unless there are citations for lists of such t hings maintained and governed by regional districts, these categories and articles are wholly original research and highly questionable. And that the person who created these lists and categories didn't know enough to include "the" before the RD names suggests to me that they didn't know either the subject matter or what RDs are. Which means that original research was conducted to locate and find them all; BC Archives classifies its holdings by RDs, at least.....but historic site listings? Whose are those?Skookum1 (talk) 10:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- BC Names classifies its entries by Land Districts, for example.Skookum1 (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.